Agreement Not To Be Recorded

Widget not in any sidebars

Between two individuals, it is not forbidden to record conversations. However, the problem arises when, for whatever reason, this conversation is made available to a third party without the agreement of both parties. Consent may be obtained retroactively or invoked as being in the public interest. For example, journalists often record secret conversations, but their defense is that the content is in the public interest and should be disclosed; in the knowledge of the recording would significantly change the content of the conversation. Here, a narrow line is drawn and many legal battles have emerged to determine what is in the public interest and what is not. Injunctions are the most effective option available to the admitted person, who believes that recordings have been made without consent, as well as all claims for compensation arising from them. [7] The introduction of telephone communications technology has created an area in which new laws need to be introduced to protect and secure the privacy of telephone communications, while allowing the safety and work of the police through the recording of telephone calls. Laws relating to telephone recording differ from country to country or region to country. Some countries and regions that have differences in telephone recording legislation are: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, India, Italy, Ireland, Latvia, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States of America. Each region has different laws, including specifications on what can and cannot be registered and what can remain private for people during the call.

It`s surprisingly simple. However, recording conversations without the participant`s knowledge is essentially considered a violation of that person`s right to privacy.. . . .